I saw an episode of School Pride that featured the school's new vegetable garden that they called "teaching garden". I thought that's a good name for a personal blog about teaching, learning and living.
Friday, February 4, 2011
Photosophics 1
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Age Doesn't Matter!
My friend Norma asked me a question last night via Facebook. For practical purposes, I am rephrasing her question as:
Why is the sum of the person's two-digit birth year and that person's age plus one always equal to 111?
Norma, who is now 34, was born in '76. She observed that 76 + 34 + 1 = 111.
I thought of Matty. He was born in '83. Last year, he turned 27. Observe that 85 + 25 + 1 = 111.
My student Alisha, who was born in '96, celebrated her 14th birthday last year. Well, 96 + 14 + 1 = 111.
"So why does this work?," Norma insisted.
Readers, what do you think?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
SOLUTION:
When you say your birth year is 76, you actually mean 1976, which is 1900 + 76.
So if your birth year is X, then it is actually (1900 + X).
If you were born in the year (1900 + X), then in the year 2010, your age was [2010 - (1900 + X)] years old.
So your birth year plus your age plus one
= X + [2010 - (1900 + X)] + 1
= X + 2010 - 1900 - X + 1
= 111.
It doesn't matter how old the person is, the result will always be 111.
Norma's question reminded me of a similar problem. Last December, in a statewide conference I attended in Dallas, the following question (that I also rephrased) was raised for us to play with:
Add your age by the end of this year to the year you were born. What do you get?
Now your turn. Prove why it works.
Why is the sum of the person's two-digit birth year and that person's age plus one always equal to 111?
Norma, who is now 34, was born in '76. She observed that 76 + 34 + 1 = 111.
I thought of Matty. He was born in '83. Last year, he turned 27. Observe that 85 + 25 + 1 = 111.
My student Alisha, who was born in '96, celebrated her 14th birthday last year. Well, 96 + 14 + 1 = 111.
"So why does this work?," Norma insisted.
Readers, what do you think?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
SOLUTION:
When you say your birth year is 76, you actually mean 1976, which is 1900 + 76.
So if your birth year is X, then it is actually (1900 + X).
If you were born in the year (1900 + X), then in the year 2010, your age was [2010 - (1900 + X)] years old.
So your birth year plus your age plus one
= X + [2010 - (1900 + X)] + 1
= X + 2010 - 1900 - X + 1
= 111.
It doesn't matter how old the person is, the result will always be 111.
Norma's question reminded me of a similar problem. Last December, in a statewide conference I attended in Dallas, the following question (that I also rephrased) was raised for us to play with:
Add your age by the end of this year to the year you were born. What do you get?
Now your turn. Prove why it works.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)